The ‘abandoned’ UK seaside town ‘betrayed’ by Burnham and Boris – ‘we’ll give locals £500’.TA
On a visit to the struggling town, Robert Jenrick set out Reform’s vision for ending years of neglect for similar places up and down the country.
Reform’s ‘Shadow Chancellor’ Robert Jenrick campaigned with Nigel Farage in Redcar on Monday (Image: Andy Commins)
Voters in Britain’s former industrial heartlands have been “betrayed” by the Conservatives and taken for granted by Labour, according to the man Nigel Farage wants to appoint Chancellor in a Reform UK Government. Robert Jenrick, who once battled Kemi Badenoch for the Tory leadership, visited the iconic Red Wall seat of Redcar on Monday and set out his ambitions for Reform to be the true “workers’ party”. The 44-year-old walked along the seafront and described how the voters who handed the seat to Boris Johnson’s Conservatives in 2019 feel “totally betrayed by that government”, blasting the former prime minister’s “fanatical” support for net zero and the Tories’ record on immigration.
Turning his fire on a former Hartlepool MP, he said: “The truth is this area had Labour politicians who took it for granted, like Peter Mandelson, who just saw these as safe Labour seats where they could have a nice perch and do what they wanted down in Westminster.” Mr Jenrick is fighting for Reform to win in seats which “voted for change” in 2019 before backing Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour party in 2024 and discovering this is “even worse”. He said: “This cycle of constant failure and betrayal has to come to an end. That’s the point of Reform.”
Setting out his ambitions for the party which was in second place in Politico’s poll of polls on Monday on 22% – behind Andy Burnham’s Labour (26%) but ahead of Mrs Badenoch’s Conservatives (18%) – he said: “I want Reform to be a workers’ party. Everything [we do] should be putting British workers and pensioners who’ve worked hard their whole lives first. That means that my job is to cut all the waste, the stuff that other governments just won’t tackle, like foreign aid, migrants on benefits and net zero subsidies, and use the tens of billions that we save [to] make life better for people in places like this.”
Describing a flagship policy, he said: “We want to raise the personal allowance to £15,000 so that an average worker in a place like Redcar can get £500 extra a year – £1,000 if you’re a family with two people in the workplace.”
His party is a proud defender of the triple lock, the safeguard against pensioner poverty which Mr Burnham wants to alter to fund a National Care Service. Confident that as Chancellor he could help revive the centre of the town, he said: “If we can save industry in the north of England by scrapping net zero then we give these businesses a fighting chance of recovering.”
Redcar’s steelworks have been closed since 2015 but taxpayers are spending £1.3million a day, according to Westminster’s public accounts committee, keeping British Steel’s blast furnaces at Scunthorpe open to preserve the country’s primary steelmaking capacity. “We have to keep them open, and we’ve got to invest in their future,” Mr Jenrick said. “At the moment you’ve got a Government that doesn’t really have any plan as to how to make this a viable industry into the future. So, they’re just wasting millions of pounds on sticking plasters and consultants instead of really working out a viable path forward. The only way to do that is bring down the cost of energy by scrapping net zero and potentially stick tariffs on Chinese imports of steel and other products like cars to stop people dumping on our industry here and destroying the remaining jobs in heavy industry. At the moment Reform is the only party that’s willing to do that.”
He is not impressed by Mr Burnham’s pledge to set out options for a new partnership with the European Union, arguing the UK has performed better in recent years than comparable EU economies.
“[The] problems our country faces are not because of Brexit and the worst thing that we could do now is spend the next five to 10 years in another pointless debate about Britain’s relationship with the European Union,” he said.
However, the former immigration minister is damning in his account of Britain’s record in this area since Brexit. He claimed his old party “managed to design an immigration system even more liberal than the one that we had in the EU, where we traded high-skilled, motivated people from Eastern Europe for low-skilled workers”.
Claiming that post-Brexit “opportunities are out there to be seized”, he said: “We can fix this. I am optimistic on the economy that we can turn things around… If you have a Government that comes in with a serious plan it can create a climate of optimism very quickly and get things moving again.”
Robert Jenrick is on track to run the Treasury in a Reform UK Government (Image: Andy Commins)
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
If he moves into the Treasury, he may face many of the same challenges which today confront Chancellor John Healey as he wrestles with numerous threats to the public finances. Does he fear market panic? Mr Jenrick said that neither the Conservatives nor Labour had “instilled enthusiasm” in the markets. “We’ve had Liz Truss’s mini-budget, Rachel Reeves crying in the House of Common, John Healey making promises he can’t keep,” he said. “I think there’s actually an opportunity to come in and surprise the markets [and show] that for the first time in a long time they’ve got serious people running this country. The way to do it, actually, is cutting the benefits bill. That’s what is the number one thing you could do, very quickly, to instil confidence in the bond markets.”
Bringing down benefits payments, he said, would show investors that “we’re serious people who know what we’re doing and we’re going to be careful with people’s money”. Mr Jenrick joined Reform in January after being sacked as Shadow Justice Secretary by Mrs Badenoch. Did it feel strange for him not to be with former colleagues in Birmingham for the annual conference?
He said: “I always like going to Birmingham because I was born in Wolverhampton… But no, I [am] actually very pleased to be in Reform and this feels like home to me, so it’s been great.”
Days later, after Mrs Badenoch had delivered her conference speech and pledged to exempt family homes from inheritance tax, Mr Jenrick told the Express: “The Tories have given up on working people, in favour of their mates in Kensington. Andy Burnham abandoned them too to court votes on Benefits Street. Reform is the only national party interested in cutting taxes on the hard-working majority. That’s why in my first Budget I will raise the tax-free personal allowance to £15,000 to give 40 million a tax cut. It’ll mean the state pension is never taxed and work pays again.”
Andy Burnham clarifies ‘fairer’ state pension triple lock changes for those born 1967-1996
Andy Burnham says the change is fairer and asked people what they think
Andy Burnham announced the change (Image: CHRISTOPHER FURLONG, POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Andy Burnham has provided clarification following proposed alterations to the State Pension. The Prime Minister has confirmed that should Labour secure victory at the next general election the party intends to reform the mechanism determining yearly increases.
Existing regulations mean that the State Pension increases each April by a figure based on the “triple lock“, meaning the rise corresponds to either the inflation rate, average earnings growth or 2.5% – whichever proves highest. But concerns have been raised over its long-term viability, given it has produced substantial growth in State Pension values.
Data from the Institute for Fiscal Studies reveals that since it was introduced in 2011, the triple lock has seen State Pension values rise considerably faster than had it followed solely prices or earnings. It said the pension was now approximately 14% higher than it would have been if it had only tracked earnings.
At present, most people on a full State Pension receive £241.30 a week. Under the triple lock this is likely to increase to approximately £250.70 a week in April 2027.
The proposed reforms, unveiled during the Labour Party Conference, mean the State Pension will no longer increase by whichever is highest of 2.5%, average earnings or inflation, but will instead rise by the greater of inflation and 2.5%. Funds generated through these modifications will go towards establishing a National Care Service, designed to address care costs borne by families while simultaneously alleviating pressures upon the NHS.
The government’s proposals have provoked a mixed response. Critics included Sharon Graham, general secretary of the Unite union, who cautioned that the plans risked amounting to “electoral suicide”, reports the Mirror. Conversely, Tom Pope, chief economist at the think tank Institute for Government, welcomed the move, stating the triple lock was “a much more sensible way to increase pensions”.
Andy Burnham has since taken to social media to clarify what the proposed changes would mean in practice – and to canvas public opinion. Writing on his Facebook page, he said: “I want to explain what’s happening with the Triple Lock and why.
“The first thing to know is this: The state pension will keep going up. The Triple Lock means your pension rises each year by whichever is highest: inflation, wages or 2.5%. So it’s always rising.
“That exact system will stay in place until the end of this Parliament. Then, pensions will still continue to rise every year. Going up at least by inflation or 2.5%, whichever is higher. And under these proposals, wages still matter too. The state pension will continue to keep pace with earnings over time.
“The savings generated from this adjustment will help to fund a National Care Service, so older people can have the security of a State Pension that keeps rising every year, and the peace of mind of knowing they won’t face catastrophic care costs if they need support later in life.
“I think this is a fairer deal for older people. What do you think?” The post generated thousands of responses alongside more than 18,000 likes, with opinions sharply divided.
David questioned: “Why is it that when the country needs to raise money it always looks at raising it from the poorest in society i.e. pensioners and people on benefits. State pension is not a benefit it is a payment from an insurance policy that has matured. If the tax rate on earnings over 200k were to be raised by 5% it would not affect the lifestyle of those earning it.”
It will come into effect in 2030 (Image: Getty)
Brenda suggested: “It would be fairer to give pensioners the living wage and link future increases to MP’s pay rises.”
However, Stephanie supported the proposal, stating: “It’s fair, and I speak as someone a few years away from state pension age who this will affect. If we want an NHS that works then we need a care system that works too. At least you’ve grasped the nettle, which is more than your predecessors did.”
Stephen concurred, saying: “I’m in my Seventies and think the proposed changes are a good compromise for both present pensioners and younger people who have to fund our pensions.”
